Archive for ◊ October, 2009 ◊

16 Oct 2009 Suckitude, and Dealing with it
 |  Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: , ,  | 5 Comments

So it’s the day before a big deadline, my first assignment for an international newspaper, and I’m nervous. Really nervous.

I do what every sane journalist does in this situation– I spend hours, days, almost a week, hunched over my computer, trying to knock out that perfect first sentence, that perfect second sentence, that perfect third sentence, before deleting all of it because it sucks, I suck, this sucks, and I’m never going to pull this off, they’ll realize what a hack I am, I’ll be laughed at, and I’ll never work again.

Five hours before deadline, I have the outline– fourteenth so far– and every paragraph has been outlined right down to the sentence. I’ve never outlined like this before, but I’m feeling a bit crazy. After all, I have managed to convince myself that this is the height of my suckitude, and it’s my last chance, because after this, after I’ve humiliated myself with this piece, and my editor has rounded up all her other editor friends and made fun of me, and they’ve put up pictures of me on their desktops so that they can take a break every ten minutes to mock me, I’ll never get work again.

All that’s left to do now, after all that intense outlining, fact-checking, and interviewing, is prettying it up and making it flow in a way that it makes sense. This shouldn’t be hard. It should take an hour at most. But I can’t do it. I’m blocked. I’ve been blocked all week. What the hell was I thinking pitching a story to this paper? Who do I think I am?

It’s not the first time I’ve felt like this or been blocked like this. The fear can be overwhelming, but once you get past it, you can do amazing things. I remember feeling like this when I wrote my first reported piece (two rewrites), and again, recently, when I started writing for Time (36 hours of no sleep). The bigger the publication, the more pressure there typically is, not because of the name, but because you know the sheer number of people who are going to be reading– and finding fault with– your work.

When you’re writing is possibly the worst time to think about all that, but let’s face it, we do. I do. I am.

There’s not much anyone can say or do to change that feeling, and given a choice, maybe I wouldn’t want that pressure taken away from me either. Now when I write for Time, there is the pressure, but rarely the fear. I had it, and I got over it. If I suck, I suck. If I make a mistake, I’ll learn. And I’ve already learned what works and what doesn’t, and received some share of love and loathing to be comfortable in what I’m writing. I know what I want to say, and my editor helps me find the right tone in which to say it.

At this new gig though, I’m still at the stage where I’m the new kid, looking around nervously, knowing I belong, but still feeling a little out of place. I haven’t been edited yet, and I don’t know how gentle or painful it will be.

“What does everybody else do to get through this feeling [of being scared]?” a character opening up a business asked another on a TV show I was watching the other day.

“They run in the back, throw up, pass out, and smack their head on the floor,” he replies. “At least that’s what I did on my first day. There is no button to get you through this. You just jump in.”

It’s exciting to have new opportunities and challenges as a freelancer, it tells you that you’re improving and getting somewhere. But I’d be lying if I said I didn’t feel like throwing up. Any moment now, I know I’m going to pass out and smack my head on the floor.

The clip (and the paycheck) will make it all worth it.

P.S. Happy Diwali, everyone! Light a candle for someone you love.

15 Oct 2009 What I’m Reading: Works of Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni

Growing up, I read fiction that was mostly set in England, and as I matured, more and more American characters seeped into my life. What was missing was fiction I could identify with, set in India. There isn’t much, even today, when it comes to Indian fiction in English that would appeal to teenagers, but now that I’ve grown up, my library has come to house dozens of books by Indian authors, about Indian characters. And while it would have been nice to come across books such as these ones ten years ago, I’m grateful that I found them now.

**

Sister of My Heart by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni

The story, which revolves around two cousin sisters Sudha and Anju and their three mothers, is an intimate portrayal of family obligations, of rifts, of responsibilities, of sacrifices, and mostly, of love. The narrative follows the two women, as they grow up together, fall in love, and get talked into arranged marriages. They follow their husbands– one to rural India, another to America. The plot is definitely worth a mention, but what is most interesting about this book is the way it intimately portrays the relationships among these women, and the choices they make because of it. Typically, books about Indian arranged marriages fall into the trap of cliche and portray very stereotypical characters. That was certainly not the case with this book, and I recommend it highly. It’s one of the best books I’ve read all year.

Tip: Don’t start reading if you have an important deadline looming.

**

The Vine of Desire by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni

The first hundred pages of this sequel to Sister of My Heart were a disappointment. The next hundred showed potential. In the remainder of the book, Divakaruni was back in good form. For someone who hasn’t read Sister of My Heart, this could very well be a disappointing read. In fact, for someone who has, the first half of the book is sheer agony. You know what Divakaruni is capable of– you’ve read it, and you’ve rushed to the bookstore on your first day off to get more– but you can’t see it in these pages. There’s too much backstory, too many riddles, too much time taken to get to the point. But when she does get there eventually, she does it well. This one didn’t measure up to the potential the way the first book did, but it does carry the characters through changes in their lives, to new depths and meanings, in unexpected ways and with beautiful language. Though overwritten at times, the book is again, an intimate peek into the changed lives of characters you thought you knew so well, and who often surprise you.

**

The Mistress of Spices by Chitra Banerjee Divakaruni

I never thought I’d read this book, let alone enjoy it. I am, after all, a big critic of the mango chutney and spices kind of book that ignores the real India for the illusion and the cliché of it. What can I say? Sometimes, illusion can be good too. If you can’t stand Tom Robbins, you probably won’t like this book. While the novel is set against a backdrop of immigrant Indians in America, the culture, and of course the spices, the real story is about one woman’s lifelong quest for more than what she has, and finally finding the acceptance to take what life throws her way. The book is part poetry, part fairy tale, and part storytelling. The knowledge of the various spices and what they’re used for in India will go a long way with the understanding of some of the subtleties, though that’s not to say that you can’t enjoy it otherwise (or look them up). Good book, but I still think Sister of My Heart is Divakaruni’s best work.

14 Oct 2009 Why Some Writers Won’t Share Their Contacts
 |  Category: Uncategorized  | Tags: ,  | Leave a Comment

One of the most commonly asked question journalists and writers receive is, “Who’s your editor at such-and-such publication?” One of the most common complaints is that fellow freelancers and journalists are stingy with these names. While I’m all for sharing of information and contacts, sometimes, I can understand why people want to hold their cards dear. If you’ve e-mailed another journalist and didn’t get the name you were looking for, maybe one of these reasons is why.

1. You’ve never e-mailed this writer before, she doesn’t know who you are, you don’t give a website link, and you don’t talk about previous work. No one gives out contacts to random strangers.

2. You e-mail this writer only when you need something. There’s a writer from one of my networks who e-mailed me a couple of times looking for editor names or pay rates or something. Each time, I would respond and each time that would be the end of the conversation. Here’s the deal: I am not your personal Rolodex, and I don’t like feeling treated like one.

3. Which brings me to my next point: you don’t give, you only take. I met up with a new American writer the other day, and obviously, she wanted advice about how to report in India, which I was all too happy to give. Here’s why this experience was so wonderful: she e-mailed me the next day and basically wrote: I noticed you work with so-and-so publication. I knew them before I arrived, and here’s the scoop on their office politics. And here’s what they’re currently looking for in their writers. Will I help this writer again when she needs a contact? You bet!

4. You don’t use the words “thank you” often enough. When a writer shares information, respond and say “thank you”. When a writer doesn’t share information, respond and say, “No worries, I understand. Thanks for the response.” Oh, and try and mean it.

5. The contact you’re asking for takes very few freelance submissions. Forgive the bluntness and the honesty, but if my editor is taking only one article a month from India and so far I’m the only one providing it, I would be very stupid and a very bad businessperson to then hand that information to you. I do, after all, have bills to pay.

6. You’re going to pass it on. During my early years, I worked for a few months at a national magazine here in India. At this time, a freelancer I knew from an online group asked me if I could tell her who and how to pitch, and without a second thought, I e-mailed her my work contact information with a note basically telling her to send her ideas to me and that I would make sure they got into the right hands. Well. Next thing I know, she’s posted the entire exchange on an online group list. Tip: if someone wants something posted on a group list, trust that they’re fully capable of doing so themselves. Also? Ask first!

7.  You’re a novice. See point no. 6 about why novices aren’t to be trusted. Get a few published clips on your own first, prove yourself to be professional, and have something to give back if you’re looking for true mutually beneficial and meaningful relationships.

8. She doesn’t want to. And you know what, she doesn’t have to. It doesn’t feel right to her, she’s not interested in a relationship with you, she doesn’t have the time, your boyfriend pissed her off in a past life, whatever. It doesn’t matter. Be professional, say thank you, and move on.

13 Oct 2009 Now in Print: Elle, Time, Global Post
 |  Category: Uncategorized  | One Comment

One of the most heart-breaking stories I’ve ever done appears in the October issue of Elle magazine (Indian edition). “The Widows of the ‘84 Riots” is a look at the survivors of one of the darkest chapters of Indian history– the anti-Sikh riots in Delhi that took place 25 years ago, after Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s assassination.

From the article:

In the camps, the young children cried out for food and water, the women went numb with grief. “Small children, they killed,” says 52-year-old Gurdeep Kaur. “I dressed up my boy in a dress, opened his hair and made ponytails, but they patted him down to check if he really was a girl, and found that he wasn’t.”

The water supply was cut off, she says. Even the pump had been destroyed. “The children were screaming for water. We had to urinate and give them that to drink. We did it because there was nothing else we could do.”

The women, she says, didn’t cry. “The heartbreak has set inside of them. Watching helplessly while their loved ones were torched. The half-burned children crying, ‘Mummy, save us, save us!’ How could Mummy save them?”

The next time someone rolls their eyes when I tell them I write for Elle (which I’m very proud of, by the way), I’m going to force them to read this piece.

There aren’t many publications, especially women’s magazines, that would have carried this article without asking me to change it. When I proposed the idea, I expected my editor to reject it saying it’s too dark for Elle’s audience. Instead, she agreed that if no one else will say it, maybe we should. In fact, she suggested that we add more voices to it, and made it one of the main features for the month.

When I submitted my first draft, I expected substantial cuts and rewrites asking me to tone down on some of the details like the one above. Not only were they printed as submitted, but the number of pages were increased because I went over my assigned word count.

I’m so grateful for my editors who trust me enough to agree to a story even when it seems so awfully out of place for them. And of course, for letting me tell it the way I want to. Pick up a copy!

For Time.com, I wrote the piece, “India’s Floods Reveal Climate Change Specter.”

And finally, since a little controversy never hurt anyone, I wrote this piece on stem cell treatments in India that I’ve been researching for several months, for Global Post: Unfettered by regulation, India pulls ahead on stem cell treatments

Sure enough, it was linked to by the Huffington Post and their readers had a lot to say.

12 Oct 2009 Ken Wells: What Journalists Need

Journalists need three things.

The first is passion. Why are you doing this? What gets you out of bed in the morning? Figure that out, and devote as much attention as possible to those parts of your job. I still think journalism is the greatest racket in the world. You have a license to snoop, to ask questions of anyone.

The second thing is determination. Make yourself known and make your passions known. Push yourself and others to get space and time to explore your interests.

The third thing is persistence. It’s a virtue. What we do is not for wimps. Work hard and work smart. To take over a beat and really do something with it, you have to do your homework.

— Ken Wells, page-one editor, The Wall Street Journal.

09 Oct 2009 The Editor Hall of Fame
 |  Category: Uncategorized  | Tags:  | Leave a Comment

Most writers talk about editor horror stories (obviously, they’re more fun), but once in a while it’s nice to acknowledge the truly great ones. Some days, it feels wonderful to be a freelancer because editors say things like this:

“We’re not having the kind of budget problems other people are, so we’re happy to pay for travel.”

“We work hard here to keep correspondents happy.”

“I was doing payroll this morning, and wanted to try to sneak a partial payment in for you.” (The piece was still in editing.)